The legal proceedings surrounding the death of Assam’s beloved singer, Zubeen Garg, reached a fever pitch today as two different legal systems presented starkly different versions of how the icon died.

While a Coroner’s Court in Singapore heard testimony suggesting a tragic accident due to severe intoxication, the Assam government is simultaneously preparing a "powerhouse" prosecution team to prove that the singer was, in fact, murdered.

The Singapore Coroner’s Hearing (Jan 14, 2026)

On Wednesday, the Singapore Coroner's Court opened its formal inquiry into the events of September 19, 2025. The testimony provided by Singaporean authorities has introduced significant "reasonable doubt" that the defense is likely to exploit in the Indian trial.

1. "Severely Intoxicated" Status Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) David Lim of the Singapore Police Coast Guard testified that toxicology reports found Zubeen Garg’s blood alcohol level at 333mg/100ml. This is more than four times the legal limit in Singapore. The court was told this level of intoxication would cause "severe impairment of coordination and reflexes."

2. Refusal of Safety Gear The most striking detail from today’s testimony was the revelation that Garg reportedly declined a life jacket. The investigating officer stated that Garg initially wore a life jacket for his first swim but removed it because it was "too big." When he entered the water for a second time, he was offered a smaller, better-fitting jacket, which he refused.

3. No Signs of Foul Play Singapore police confirmed to State Coroner Adam Nakhoda that based on their 35 witnesses—including the yacht captain, paramedics, and fellow passengers—there were no signs of a struggle, no suicidal intent, and no immediate evidence of "foul play." The autopsy confirmed the cause of death as drowning, with physical injuries on the body being consistent with aggressive CPR efforts.

The Assam Counter-Narrative: Murder and Conspiracy:-

Despite the findings in Singapore, the Assam SIT is moving forward with its 3,500-page chargesheet filed in December 2025. The Indian investigators believe the drowning was not a simple accident but the result of a coordinated plan.

Murder Charges Upheld: The SIT has charged the festival organizer, Shyamkanu Mahanta, and Garg's manager, Siddhartha Sharma, along with two band members, with Section 103 (Murder) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Their argument rests on the claim that the accused knowingly created a situation where the singer would be in danger, possibly motivated by financial irregularities and misappropriation of funds.

Financial Irregularities: A separate but linked investigation by the CID is focusing on how Garg's manager, Siddhartha Sharma, allegedly handled the singer's finances. The SIT claims that funds intended for the singer were diverted, providing a potential motive for the alleged crime.

Government Response:-

In a move to reassure the public and the singer's family, the Assam Cabinet on January 9, 2026, approved a high-profile team of Special Public Prosecutors (SPPs) to handle the trial in Guwahati.

Senior Lead: Ziaul Kamar, a prominent Senior Advocate of the Gauhati High Court, has been appointed as the Special Public Prosecutor.
Support Team: He will be assisted by Brojendra Mohan Choudhury (Additional SPP) and three Assistant SPPs.

Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma stated that this team was formed to ensure the "government's side is put forward effectively," responding to requests from Zubeen’s wife, Garima Garg, for a prosecution team that could match the high-profile defense lawyers hired by the accused.

All eyes are now on the Kamrup (Metro) District and Sessions Court in Guwahati. The next hearing is scheduled for January 17, 2026. This will be the first time the court sits following the dramatic revelations from the Singapore Coroner’s Court.

Legal Challenges for the Prosecution: Legal experts suggest that the prosecution now faces a "double burden." They must not only prove that the accused had a motive but must also explain why the Singapore authorities—who were first on the scene—found no evidence of murder. The defense is expected to use the "333mg/100ml" blood alcohol report to argue that the death was a self-inflicted accident caused by impaired judgment.

Conclusion: -

As the Zubeen Garg Trust receives a ₹5 crore grant from the state government to preserve his legacy, the legal battle for his death remains the most watched case in Northeast India. The clash between the "Accidental Drowning" report from Singapore and the "Murder Conspiracy" chargesheet from Assam creates a complex legal puzzle that only a full-scale trial can solve.

For the legal community, this case serves as a masterclass in how different jurisdictions interpret the same set of facts—one focusing on the physical science of drowning, and the other on the human intent behind the events.

Legal Disclaimer: This report is based on ongoing judicial proceedings and testimonies. All accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty.