Though the PIL was dismissed, the legal community views the case as a "wake-up call." Here are the potential future steps:

State-Level Interventions: Since "Social Security" is a subject where both Central and State governments can act, individual states can create better "Halfway Homes" or "Assisted Living Centers" for disabled adults.
Strengthening the RPwD Act: Advocates suggest that the Rules under the RPwD Act should be amended to specifically include "institutional transition" protocols.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): There is a growing plea for the private sector to bridge the gap by funding specialized rehabilitation centers for young adults with disabilities.

The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL is a reminder of the limits of judicial intervention in policy matters. However, the vulnerability of children with disabilities leaving institutional care remains a pressing reality. While the legal "petition" has ended, the moral and social obligation of the state to ensure that these citizens do not fall through the cracks remains.

For a society to be truly inclusive, the "safety net" must stay intact even after a child blows out 18 candles on their birthday cake. As legal professionals and citizens, the focus must now shift toward holding the executive accountable for the implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act in its truest spirit.