In a sobering revelation that highlights a deep crisis in India's criminal justice system, 6. Supreme Court Justice Vikram Nath stated that 70% of India's prison population comprises undertrials who have not been found guilty of any crime. Speaking at NALSAR University in Hyderabad during the release of the Fair Trial Programme Report, Justice Nath exposed systemic failures where many undertrials have spent time in custody exceeding the maximum sentence for their alleged offenses, while others charged with bailable offenses remain imprisoned simply because they cannot afford bail.

The Undertrial Crisis: India's Hidden Injustice

Justice Nath's statement shines a spotlight on one of India's most pressing human rights issues. The fact that seven out of ten prisoners are awaiting trial—not convicted of any crime—represents a fundamental breakdown of the principle that one is innocent until proven guilty. These individuals are being punished before any court has determined their guilt.

The situation is even more tragic when undertrials spend years in custody waiting for their cases to be heard. In many instances, the time already served exceeds the maximum punishment they would receive if convicted. This means people are effectively serving sentences for crimes they may never be found guilty of committing.

The Poverty Penalty

Justice Nath highlighted a particularly disturbing aspect of the undertrial crisis: many prisoners remain in jail simply because they cannot afford bail. While wealthier accused persons can secure their release by furnishing bail bonds, poor individuals charged with the same offenses languish behind bars for years awaiting trial.

This creates a two-tier justice system where liberty depends on wealth rather than the merits of the case. The constitutional guarantee of equality before the law becomes meaningless when poverty itself becomes a reason for imprisonment. These undertrials lose their livelihoods, their families suffer, and their lives are permanently damaged—all before any finding of guilt.

Legal Aid Must Be Effective, Not Just Available

Justice Nath made a crucial distinction that goes to the heart of the problem. He emphasized that legal aid must be "effective, not merely available." Simply having a legal aid system on paper is not enough if it doesn't actually help undertrials secure their rights.

Many legal aid lawyers are overburdened, under-resourced, and unable to provide the quality representation needed to navigate India's complex legal system. An undertrial assigned a legal aid lawyer who meets them for five minutes before a hearing is not receiving effective representation. Without proper legal assistance, undertrials cannot effectively apply for bail, challenge illegal detention, or ensure their cases move forward.

A Constitutional Crisis of Liberty

The undertrial crisis represents nothing less than a constitutional emergency. Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. When 70% of prisoners are detained without conviction—many for crimes they may never be found guilty of, and others simply because they are poor—this fundamental right is being systematically violated.

Justice Nath's remarks at the Fair Trial Programme Report launch underscore the urgent need for comprehensive reform. The criminal justice system has failed its most vulnerable citizens, and the consequences are devastating not just for the undertrials themselves, but for their families and communities.

The path forward requires immediate action: speedy trials must become a reality rather than a distant promise; bail reform must ensure that poverty is not a barrier to liberty; legal aid must be properly funded and effective; and undertrial detention must be the exception, not the norm. Until these changes are made, India's prisons will continue to hold thousands of innocent people whose only crime was being poor and powerless.